Showing posts with label sexual consent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexual consent. Show all posts

Friday, 27 October 2017

Me Too Part Two

Last weeks post had the highest initial hit rate of anything I've posted to date.  I think this is thanks to the zeitgeist of the #metoo campaign, however this doesn't lessen the personal relevance of this topic.  Today I'm focusing on addressing questions that came up - both from others and from myself - from the last post.

The first thing I want to restate is that my intention with blogging is not to shock.  I write to help people feel less alone in their experiences.  I mean this generally - not just in terms of last weeks topic.  It took going to rehab to come to this realisation myself and it completely changed my life.  Because no matter what you've experienced in life, someone else will have experienced it too.

Maybe not down to the infinitesimal details - but the crux will be the same.  For me, realising I was not alone helped me feel stronger - like thousands of strangers were standing behind me and propping me up.  When I write, I hope to impart this feeling to others.  Yes, reading something on the internet is a dilution of living with people like yourself (as I did in rehab) - but the gist is the same.  You are not alone.  Someone else understands what you are going through no matter how strange or awful it is.
I promise you this.


* * *

The next thing I want to say is that I know my post did shock some people.  I'm glad as it means that some people have not had the experiences I have.  When I look back at my life objectively it is not an exaggeration to say I was an easy target for this kind of abuse.
  • I came from an unstable nuclear family
  • My parents came from unstable families
  • I had an upbringing focused on the differences in the roles of men and women
  • I grew up in an era where it was commonplace to leave kids to their own devices
  • I was a fast developer
Coming from an unstable family meant that it was difficult for me to feel I could rely on my parents.  And moving frequently meant it was difficult to build stable relationships with adults outside of my family.  I felt independent from a very young age - I think this was a combination of situation and personality.  As a means of maintaining my independent position, I rarely took my problems to my parents.  They had other stuff going on and I genuinely believed I was better at managing them myself.

In defense of my parents, they both grew up in unstable homes too.  I will say no more than that as it's their story to tell, but it is an objective truth.  Both of my parents wanted to be better parents than they felt their parents had been.  And for the most part they were good parents.  We were by no means neglected and we were definitely loved.  But I think they lacked the skills - having not had it themselves - to really emotionally connect with us.  As a child I never felt close to either of my parents.  And living among the instability of their relationship further distanced me from them.

Haphazard religion provided an odd focus on some old fashioned ideas regarding gender roles.  Growing up on farms, I learned that a woman could do anything provided she came home and cooked and cleaned afterward.  And good women kept their hair long.  A dominant scary father and submissive, shy mother were my gender role models.  And whilst from a young age I rallied to be defined differently, it was difficult to fight my conditioning.

And it was the 80's.  I think people may have forgotten how normal it was to just let kids play by themselves back then.  In this respect my childhood was no different than that of my peers.  In truth, we were even more closely monitored than many kids I knew.  And in the country especially, most of the time (I feel) we were safe.

To me Boy reflected how things were growing up in the country in the 80's,
albeit a more extreme reflection than how I personally grew up.


The only times these incidents took place was when there were small opportunistic windows.  And they only happened more than once because I never said anything.

* * *

And once something becomes a bit dented it breaks more easily the next time it falls.

Being exposed to sexual things early made me come to expect these experiences as normal*.  I had also been groomed my entire life to be a 'nice girl'.  I found (and still find) it hard to deviate from this.  As a 'nice' teenage girl with early sexual encounters I struggled to understand how to set boundaries in terms of sex.  I struggled to even understand my own sexuality, as it always seemed be defined by who I was with.  I was a 'nice' girl - lost.

Teen me, my boyfriend and bro crew (faces greyed for privacy.

I soon found a solution to that boundary setting problem which meant I rarely had to deviate from 'nice'.  I became a serial monogamist.  Constantly having a boyfriend meant I no longer had to have those awkward conversations.  I could just say 'Sorry, I have a boyfriend'.  This was especially helpful as growing up, most of my friends were boys**.  Always having a boyfriend meant I could still hang out with my guy mates as mates with no worries.  The longest I've ever been single since I was fourteen was for about three months.

Before I came up with that solution however, I tried something else.  Hitting puberty before my peers was hard.  There were different expectations of me and new interest in me.  This was uncomfortable, along with the new feeling of jiggle when I ran.  And when things became worse at home and we*** finally left, I started trying to instill my own control with how I ate.

I wouldn't say I was anorexic - my weight loss and outlook were never that extreme.  I would say I went through periods of very unhealthy relationships with food.

After cutting so much from my diet that my body started to reject food (uncontrollably vomiting after eating) I freaked out a bit and made a conscious effort to eat more normally.  Since then though - up until my mid 20's I had patches of binging and purging, excessive exercising and extreme dieting - each incident sparked by something in my life which triggered a strong urge to control whatever I could.  This hasn't been problematic for years, but viewing food as a facilitator of control or pleasure is something that will never go away.

The latest Kardashian cover

Following this, I tried to love the body I was in - curvy.  But not seeing this body type reflected on TV or in magazines at that time, I turned to the only outlet that seemed to appreciate women who looked like me - pornography.  I watched it.  I read it.  I drew pictures of it.  It wasn't a thing of sexual titillation - it was just the only way I could see women who looked like me 'appreciated' other than in paintings that were hundreds of years old.  None of this will have helped me in terms of having realistic expectations regarding my body, sex and relationships.

These days, us curvy ladies have the Kardashians to look up to.  But like the women in porno, they are there to sell one thing - sex****.  If society idolised women based on their skills rather than their looks we could begin to see a larger representation of women in terms of looks.  And the focus would start to shift from what we looked like at all.  To me, this is optimal in terms of shifting the focus from women as objects to women as people.

The Librarians 'cover' - way more awesome
* * *

The other thing I realised after posting is that in all my history of this stuff is that I never personally experienced any kind of workplace sexual harassment.   Have I witnessed it?  Yes, a number of times.  But it never happened to me.

I think this is because at work I'm quite a different person.  Work has preset boundaries which makes it easier for me to set personal boundaries.  Also, I'm kinda bolshy - I'm the person people dreaded having in operations meetings because I would always bring up (important) issues not on the agenda.  In the workplace colleagues were (and maybe still are?) a bit scared of me.  Consequently, they have never been any kind of sexual threat.

The kinds of women I've seen harassed at work were almost the antithesis of me at work - shy, soft-spoken, or possessing a fragility obvious underneath a staunch facade - this hasn't changed over the 20+ years I've worked.  It's horrible.  I've seen sexual harassment perpetrated by colleagues, bosses, clients and customers.  They purposefully target quieter women as they seem like a 'safe' bet.  And in only one instance I witnessed did the victim actually speak up about her experience (I was her boss.  We took it to HR.  We sorted it).

In every case I have seen (bar one, and I still feel bad about it) I have encouraged these women to speak up.  Sadly, not all of them did.  I had one workmate who suffered ongoing harassment from customers.  I encouraged her to talk to our manager but she didn't want to be a problem.  I knew our manager would back her - it was a very caring family business we worked for.  Regardless, she was scared she would lose her job.  I couldn't speak for her - I understood and respected her position - how could I not?  I was in it so often in my own life.  But I still felt sad for her.

Thank you Taylor Swift for outing this opportunistic creep.  Straight up workplace harassment.


* * *

I think I could write about this all day every day and still have more to say.  But I have to leave it here for now.

I am so grateful for all the people who messaged me - publicly or in private - last week.  Mostly because it shows we are starting to open up a dialogue about these uncomfortable things.  Because they need to be talked about***** if we are going to understand how to change things to make this a safer place for the next generation.

Thank you Poto Williams         
I hope this legislation gets through!
 
I am hopeful that the #metoo movement heralds bigger changes.  It is hard to see us able to move very far when we still have men in power like Donald TrumpBut it's certainly a possibility.  I am grateful that at least here in New Zealand a change in government will likely mean changes to our criminal justice system putting the onus on the accused rather than the accuser.  At least that's a start.

We still have a long way to go.

* Not exactly relevant to me, but important to note that about 1/3 of women who experience rape before the age of 18 experience rape as an adult (US stats - struggling to get the link to work sorry).

** As a kid I didn't really 'get' most other girls.  I generally had different interests, and on hitting puberty early, and becoming even more different, I started to get bullied for those differences.  Until I hit my late 20's all my closest friendships had been with dudes, and I'm grateful to still count some of those guys in my close circle today (although also grateful to have met a bunch of fucking amazing women who get me and love me anyway).

*** When I was 14 I left home and my Mum followed shortly after.  We then got a small flat in Helensville and Mum and Dad had joint custody of my brother.

**** They do this so they can sell us something else - the Kardashian brand.  Because they know that sex sells.  From their perspective, it's smart marketing, but unfortunately most of us don't really watch the Kardashians because we appreciate their marketing skills.


***** I don't think that everyone should feel like they have to talk about this stuff.  For some people, this may not be helpful to their mental wellbeing.  They should not feel like they have to talk about it until they are ready.  That is unfair.  I am comfortable having this dialogue which is why I do it.  Although it may not seem so, there are plenty of things I do not feel comfortable talking about.  Yet.

Tuesday, 12 November 2013

On Our Strong Reaction to Roast Busters



Every now and then our nation goes totally crazy over a local news article.  In this case, people have  started a petition, managed to get popular radio hosts taken off air, and have even offered a $4000NZD reward for 'footage of the Roast Busters getting hidings'.  I just wanted to talk about why I think there has been such a massive response to the Roast Busters case.  Just in case anyone out there didn't understand.

In terms of numbers men and women are fairly equal in New Zealand - we have 0.99 males per female - which means we have about 2.3 million women living here.  And of those women, about 25% of them will have been sexually assaulted as girls.  That's 575,000 women - almost 13% of all Kiwi's.*  So if we just think about these people, if we forget about everyone else who thinks that having sex with underage drunk girls and bragging about it on the internet is not ok, we're looking at a large percentage of our population for whom this case probably feels quite personal.  That's a lot of people.

I am one of those people.  I am not one of the people who is traumatised by this, but it is probably why I care enough about this case to write this post.  I never reported the date-rape (whilst comatose drunk), or the many sexual assaults as, like many, I thought they were probably my fault.  And because these things happened to other people I knew, I figured it was normal, not something worth reporting and not a big deal.

But it is a big deal, and these days we seem to be (or are supposed to be) more aware of that.  And because we (the people) should be more aware, our police should be too.  The second reason people are upset is because of the handling of this case by police.  Like many other people, I thought our law enforcement teams had evolved past asking a 13 year old rape victim about what she was wearing.  This information is irrelevant and unhelpful victim blaming.  Willie Jackson and John Tamihere's interview with 'Amy' about the Roast Busters actions generated more victim blaming, which sat in stark contrast to their description of the boys actions as 'mischief'.

An estimated 90% of sexual assaults go unreported in New Zealand.  I don't think it's hard to see why when our police** and our elders (two political figures/media personalities) clearly do not take sexual assault seriously.  When you are traumatised and you know you were doing something you probably shouldn't have (drinking underage) when the assault happened, in the current environment you need a very stable sense of self worth to feel you can report it.  And sexual assault is a pretty good tool at eroding a persons feeling of worth.  The Police's treatment of this case has confirmed all our fears around reporting sexual assault.

And the third reason the fecal matter has really hit the fan is because one of the boys at the center of the scandal reportedly had familial links to the police investigating the case.  Another boy has a famous father, and some investigative journalism turned up that Mr Tamihere is friends with another boys father.  So it looks very much to the public as though preferential treatment has been given to these boys because of who they are.

We New Zealanders have a long history in protesting injustice (although the current government has attempted to quash this).  From Parihaka's peaceful 'Year of the Plow', to the Springbok tour of '81, through to the recent Occupation of Aotea Square.  We strongly support the underdog because, really, we are the underdog.  So of course we rail against these boys and their celebrity Dad's treatment (or lack of treatment) regarding this case.  It's just what we do.

*                *                *                *                *                *

So that's why there's such a big fuss being made.  And I agree that a big fuss should be made, but I am concerned that people are missing the big picture here.  Although I understand the villagers/pitchforks/drive-them-out mentality, threatening these boys will not solve any problems.  And as far as I'm concerned they are still boys.  18 is not as young as 13, but these boys were 16 when the specific incident happened.  And 18 is still very young.  At 18 I got myself into credit card debt and did all sorts of other stupid things (blame it all on the pre-frontal cortex).  Don't get me wrong, I'm not excusing their behavior, but instead of destroying these boys, surely it's more important for us to ask why this happened?

Because I personally think (I could be wrong here though?) that our sexual assault statistics paint a pretty screwed up picture.  The Roast Busters case is purely a symptom of a much bigger issue.  The issue that we are failing to acknowledge, and it might be because they are children of celebrities, or because they go to public schools in West Auckland***, is that these boys are doing what MANY other boys are doing - the only difference is that they were stupid enough to brag about it on Facebook.

How do I know that many boys are doing this?  Because 1/4 of our girls are being sexually assaulted.  I don't think it takes a genius to realise that this means a large proportion of our boys/men think that sexual assault is ok.  Sure, you can lie to yourself and say it's probably just a few bad apples doing all of the bad things, and that you know lots of guys, and none of them would ever sexually assault anyone, but I just don't think that's true.

As long as sexual assault goes unreported, and unpunished, we have an issue.  And as long as people think a girl in a short skirt is 'asking for it', we have an issue.  And as long as we think it's ok to disrespect women, we have an issue.  I think the fourth reason this case is hit home is because secretly, deep down, most people know that we are accountable for it.  I never reported what happened to me.  I have no idea how many other girls/women those boys assaulted, or to what degree.  My choice, although understandable, has helped form the environment these boys grew up in.

These boys need to be accountable for their actions, but not via a lynchmob.  No-one can be surprised that a boy whose family friend said, on air, that sexually assaulting a 13 year old was 'mischief', would think this behavior was ok.  As the chair of White Ribbon  said regarding this case, the misogynistic attitudes of these boys are 'endemic' in New Zealand.  This is what we really need to be looking at.  Aspects of our rugby, racing and beer culture are well past their 'best before' date.

We need to teach our daughters differently.  We need to teach them that no matter what happens, no matter what they're wearing, or how intoxicated they are, or if they've already given that boy oral sex, non-consensual sexual contact is not ok.  We need to create a safer environment for these girls to talk about it.  And we need to teach our sons differently.  We need to model respect for all women.  We need to teach them about equality, ESPECIALLY in terms of sexuality (that women and girls have a right to one).  We need to teach them about consent

We need to look at our own behaviors before we raise our pitchforks.**** 

* About 1 in 10 boys in NZ will also be sexually assaulted

** in this instance

*** As did I, and I can tell you right now it doesn't necessarily mean you are not a child of means, or of parents who love you, or of low intellect, or a 'trouble maker'

**** Even if the pitchfork is only $12.50 at Mitre 10